A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Loganathan, Saatwika
- Esthetic Correction of Anteriors: A Case Report
Authors
1 1 Yr Post Graduate, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai, Chennai-600100, Tamilnadu, IN
2 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai, Chennai-600100, Tamilnadu
3 Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai, Chennai-600100, Tamilnadu, IN
4 Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai, Chennai-600100, Tamilnadu, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 10, No 11 (2019), Pagination: 2826-2828Abstract
The common aesthetic complaint of patients is the presence of anterior spacing.It has a multifactorial etiology such as labial frenulum, microdontia, mesiodens, peg-shaped lateral incisors, agenesis, cysts, habits such as finger sucking, tongue thrusting, or lip sucking, dental malformations, genetics, proclinations, dental-skeletal discrepancies, and imperfect coalescence of interdental septum. Based on time, physical, psychological, and economical limitations treatment is planned. Direct composite resins give immediate esthetic changes in diastema cases. In this case report anterior spacing was closed with direct composite resin restoration in a single appointment and the patient was recalled after 6 months.Keywords
Esthetic, Spacing, Composite, Anteriors.
- Effect of Zinc Oxide Eugenol on Shear Bond Strength of RMGIC and Resin Cement:An in Vitro Study
Authors
1 M.D.S, I yr Post Graduate, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College & Hospital, Bharat Institute of Higher Education & Research, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College & Hospital, Bharat Institute of Higher Education & Research, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College & Hospital, Bharat Institute of Higher Education & Research, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College & Hospital, Bharat Institute of Higher Education & Research, Narayanapuram, Pallikaranai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 10, No 11 (2019), Pagination: 3003-3007Abstract
Aim: To determine the effect of Eugenol based temporary cements on bond strength of RMGIC and RelyX ARC.
Materials and Method: A total of fortymolars were sectioned 3mm below the occlusal surface and roughened surface was smoothened by 60-grit sand paper. Zinc oxide eugenol was given as a temporary restoration for 20 molars and the rest were not exposed to eugenol. Zinc oxide eugenol was removed using ultrasonic scaler and viewed under magnification for precise removal. 20 molars not exposed to eugenol were divided into group 1 (RMGIC) and group 3 (Resin). Other 20 teeth which were exposed to Eugenol were also divided similary into group 2 (Eugenol+RMGIC) and group 4 (Eugenol+Resin). Shear bond strength (SBS) testing was done using knife edge blade in the universal testing machine (INSTRON) at CIPET in Chennai.
Results: On comparing Shear Bond Strength using t-test, no statistical significance (p>0.05) was found between RMGIC groups whereas between Resin groups statistical significance was found.
Conclusion: When ZOE was used as temporary cement there was a decrease in shear bond strength for resin cement but no difference was observed in RMGIC groups.